neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
I confess I believe in UFOs, just not of the space alien kind. My experience with UFOs started with my neighbor, who was a professional astronomer. When not introducing the neighborhood to the wonders of the sky, he studied UFOs. My neighbor thought of UFOs as not of this world. However, he remained skeptical of them being space aliens.
 
Meanwhile, one summer while playing baseball, a UFO appeared over our heads. It cast a deep black shadow on a cloudless blue sky. All of us simply stood in awe of this strange disk with blue and yellow lights. Then as suddenly as it came, the UFO zipped off.
 
Then we all started talking at once. We asked each other, “What was that? What did we just see?” Whatever it was, everyone agreed that their experience was mystical. What surprised me was that some of them said the UFO deepened their faith. (Most of the people playing were from the local Lutheran Church.)
 
Investigators of the unknown, Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark noted that the rise in UFO sightings coincided with the beginnings of space exploration. Meanwhile, the burgeoning eco-spirituality movement brought out more reports of Bigfoot, the Dover Demon and other strange creatures of nature. The two authors believe that people were unknowingly creating these phenomena. Joining together unawares, disparate people formed an unfocused group mind. This unconscious uniting pushed various kinds of UFOs and strange creatures into being.
 
After studying reports of encounters with alien beings, Clark and Coleman noted that people would experience UFOs in the context of their culture and era. Some saw fairies, others angels, and modern people space aliens. Understanding what these beings are is to “understand the incomprehensible.” They summarized it as (emphasis theirs): “The UFO mystery is primarily subjective and its content primarily symbolic.”
 
Advertisements
 
REPORT THIS AD
Clark and Coleman described the continuing fascination with UFOs as being rooted in “future shock.” (Note 1) They define this as “the acceleration of changes has become unbearable and the future unimaginable.” This makes living in the present problematic. Therefore, in their opinion, some people seek liberation from Western materialism by having UFO experiences. Furthermore, Carl Jung regarded UFOs as the myth for modern times.
 
However, people have pondered UFOs long before that. The noted astronomer Johannes Kepler wrote to Galileo, “I must point that there are inhabitants, not only on the moon but on Jupiter, too.” Various mainline theologians in the 18th and 19th Centuries advocated those extraterrestrials be included as members of God’s family. Meanwhile, Swedenborg and Emerson wrote of the mystical qualities of UFOs.
 
A field of theology has developed to understand UFOs in a religious context. Ted Peters, a Lutheran theologian, defines Astrotheology as (emphasis his) “that branch of theology which provides a critical analysis of the contemporary space sciences combined with an explication of classic doctrines such as creation and Christology for the purpose of constructing a comprehensive and meaningful understanding of our human situation within an astonishingly immense cosmos.”
 
In a paper, “Introducing Astrotheology,” Peters states the four tasks of the astrotheologian. First is to “(1) overcome geocentrism and anthropocentrism.” Second is to “(2) set the conditions for the debate between a single incarnation versus multiple incarnations in Christian soteriology.” Third to “(3) offer an internal critique to the space sciences.” Finally. “(4) contribute to public readiness for the day of contact.” In short, develop “a theology of nature (emphasis his) that is cosmic in both space and time.”
 
In considering UFOs, Peters cautions against the ETI (Extraterrestrial Intelligence) Myth. The ETI Myth is one subtle influence in regarding UFOs. This myth refers to the belief that ETs exist and that they are more advanced than humans. When contact is made, the Earth will be blessed by these aliens. A corollary of the ETI Myth is the Ancient Astronaut Theory. This is the belief that aliens came to Earth in prehistory and became Gods.
 
In fact, Tom Delonge and Peter Lavenda in “Sekret Machines: Gods, Man, and War,” claim that “All religion is UFO religion.” They write, “It slowly dawned on me (Lavenda) that UFOs might very well be the key to everything we are searching for, as human beings on this planet. They are the missing link in our consciousness, in our understanding of reality and of the parameters of time and space.”
 
Belief in the UFO Gods allow people to stand in awe of the heavens. With aliens, people can experience the Divine under the blessings of science. Alien contact (and disclosure) is only a day away from official validation, thereby making that more credible. Technology as developed by aliens is an expression of the Divine. Science has melded with religion to satisfy the longings of post-modern people.
 
From what I have read and experienced, UFOs are other than Gods. They are a part of our Cosmos much like Ancestors and Land Spirits. They are beyond human understanding and not necessarily Ancient Astronauts of the Space Alien Kind. For me, UFOs have deepened my belief in the Cosmos.
 
Notes:
Note 1. From Alvin Toffler’s book “Future Shock” (1970): A condition of distress and disorientation brought on by the inability to cope with rapid societal and technological change.
 
Works Used:
 
Jerome Clark and Loren Coleman, “Creatures of the Outer Edge.” San Antonio: Anomalist Books. 2006.
—-, “The Unidentified.” 2006.
Andrew Collins and Gregory L. Little, “Origin of the Gods.”
John Michael Greer, “The UFO Chronicles.”
Dr. Allan Hunter, “Spiritual Hunger: Integrating Myth and Ritual into Daily Life.”
Gregory L. Little, “The Archetype Experience.”
Diana Walsh Pasulka, “American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology.”
neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
In “Spirituality Without Structure,” Nimue Brown, Druid author, writes “Atheist humanism shows us that we do in our lives ought to make sense in compassionate, human terms, ideally. It’s like the only measuring tool we have and should replace any ideas about what Gods allegedly want us to do.”
 
John Michael Greer, occult writer, in “A World Full of Gods,” discusses why people think of religion in this manner. “To the classical monotheist (Note 1), divinity is infinite, humanity is finite, and the only possible relationship between them is the absolute submission of the worshipper to the god.”
 
Greer responds to that thinking by describing Polytheisms. “While the greatest of Pagan gods and goddesses are superlative in their might and majesty, they and their worshippers exist in the common world and share a common measure. What the gods ask of humanity, in turn, is not object submission but respect, love and cooperation.” He continues that the Polytheistic faiths “affirm that humans to flourish in relationship with the gods and in harmony with their purposes, and that this can and will be pursued in every aspect of human life, but they also recognize that human existence as such has it own value, its own place in the broader pattern of the cosmos.” (Note 2)
 
Like many others, Brown regard revealed religions as the standard for religion. Revealed religions have an historical founder and incorporate teachings revealed by that founder. Examples are Buddhism and Christianity. In discussing the differences between spirituality and religion, many Neo-Pagans default to Christianity as “religion.”
 
Meanwhile natural religions such as Shinto are more confusing to many people. These religions are often regarded as spiritual but not religious. However, natural religions are formed by the response to something beyond humans, usually Gods or other Sacred Beings. They are orthopraxic with proper practices, but do not have orthodox beliefs.
 
Polytheism is a natural religion. However, people who are “spiritual but not religious (SBNR)” (including Neo-Pagans) focus on the doctrine of the Gods as they perceive it. This causes problems since there is no doctrine concerning the Gods. What replaces doctrine are rules on how to relate to what is holy. This becomes confused in the thinking of SBNR people that Polytheism is the same as Christianity. Therefore, its practices seem to be doctrine to SBNR people.
 
To change this thinking, Polytheism must challenge the central claims of atheism and classical monotheism. The most natural way for humans to live is to experience multiple Gods, according to Edward Butler, Polytheistic philosopher. These experiences could be considered “spiritual and religious.” Then the practices of Polytheism becomes a way of experiencing these Gods.
 
To explain religion as a function of the human brain as Atheism does is reductionistic. It denies both the reality of the Gods and human experience. As someone with a brain injury, I question the theory of Gods as rooted in the human brain. Think of music. A person can measure the hearing of the notes, but they cannot explain why the personal response to Brahms differs from Mozart. As for me, I experience the Gods outside of myself.
 
Meanwhile, Monotheism has bankrupted religious thinking in the West. That is one reason why people are “spiritual, not religious.” They have despaired of the barren, polluted world of rationality where everything is explained as the Will of God. They want a religion that encompasses all of life. Polytheism offers that.
 
Notes:
 
Note 1. Defined by John Michael Greer in “A World Full of Gods.” Classical Monotheism is “The belief in one and only one god, who is the unique eternal, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni benevolent creator of the universe.” Classical monotheism emphasizes that this god is the depenser of morality.
 
Note 2. Greer defines cosmos as “The vision of the universe as a beautifully ordered whole, in which anything that affects one part affects all parts, in which everything has a place and nothing every goes ‘away.’”
 
Further Reading:
 
Alain de Botton, “Religion for Atheists.”
Nimue Brown, “Spirituality Without Structure.”
Edward Butler, “The Way of the Gods”
John Michael Greer, “A World Full of Gods.”
Dr. Linda Mercadante, “Belief Without Borders.”
neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
 For modern Polytheists, the concept of “spiritual but not religious” (SBNR) needs to be examined. Many problems that modern Polytheists often encounter are from people who are SBNR. These issues range from expressions of piety to sacrifices to the Gods.
 
In “Spirituality Without Structure,” Nimue Brown, Druid author, writes “Religion is the means by which countless lives have been harnessed, saddled, and sent forth to suit a private or political agenda.” She continues, “I’m too anarchic too opposed to authority and oppression.” Her version of religion is shared by many. It is also an underlying assumption by SBNR people encountering Polytheist practices.
 
In her book, Brown explains the differences between spirituality as experienced by the individual, and religion as a formal system. She states that Atheists and people of conventual faith can “lend themselves to a genuine spiritual outlook.” This separation of religion from spirituality enables people to be “spiritual but not religious.”
 
What does that mean – spiritual but not religious? This contemporary idea refers to the sacred interior life of a person, who does not belong to a religious organization. Another term for this could be “non-ritual personal faith.” According to Rev. Linda Mercadante, religious scholar, SBNR people are usually anti-institutional and private in their beliefs. She separates them into several categories. The dissenter dislikes institutional religion. The casual believer prefers therapeutic spirituality such as New Age practices. The explorer is a spiritual tourist. The seeker is searching for a new religious identity. Finally, the immigrant has joined a new spiritual community.
 
Rev. Mercadante, in her studies, said that today, religion is thought of as a social construct, and spirituality is the interior life. She says that in prior times, spirituality was considered the same as piety. For this reason, spirituality and piety overlap in modern society in a confusing manner, although modern people think of piety in terms of “annoying church ladies.”
 
In “Spirituality Without Structure,” Brown describes a spiritual experience as giving a person “a feeling of profound connection with something beyond themselves. That something doesn’t have to be a god. It could be a place, a person, tradition, or an idea.” This fits in with my working definition of spirituality as the awareness of a person of something beyond themselves. Meanwhile, religion is the response to that something.
 
Rev. Mercadante writes in “Belief Without Borders,” that SBNRs and Atheists agree that spirituality is a “this-worldly reality, often conflated with … mental health or emotional well-being.” She says that spirituality is portrayed as “a personal, individual, and heart-felt state that is easily divorced from organized religion.” She observes what Nimue Brown expresses as the standard view of religion – external, organized, dogmatized, and group oriented,” in SBNR people.
 
This presents something for modern Polytheists to ponder. As more people leave Neo-Paganism to become Polytheists, they often carry this idea of religion with them. Since many modern Polytheists are immigrants to Polytheism, I believe that the first step is to remember when we first entered the country known as Polytheism.
 
Further Reading:
 
Alain de Botton, “Religion for Atheists.”
Nimue Brown, “Spirituality Without Structure.”
Edward Butler, “The Way of the Gods”
John Michael Greer, “A World Full of Gods.”
Rev. Linda Mercadante, “Belief Without Borders.”
neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
Since most of us live in Monotheistic-dominant cultures, the concepts of Gods can be a thorny issue. The usual presentation in the culture about Polytheism is as follows: “Your Gods are merely stories and therefore your faith is based on lies.” The logic of Monotheism is that the Gods are imaginary beings. The proposition that there is only the One True God is asserted as the only truth concerning Deities. Moreover, this God is the all-powerful Creator, Who watches over all. Yahweh (Note 1) is greater than all the silly Gods of ancient myths.
 
What Ben Hunt of Epsilon Theory calls the “Narrative Machine” is at work. He defines this as “Where the translation of ‘reality’ takes place within a large Machine of strategic communication and game playing.” Since the Narrative Machine is an invisible network of social interaction, it shapes and controls how people think about things. Through contextual connections and networks, it creates a body of “Common Knowledge” (Note 2) for modern society to operate under.
 
Monotheism is the de facto standard for understanding religion. Within the Narrative Machine are many logical fallacies to direct people’s thinking about what is “proper religion.” “Missionary language” tells people to see the Gods as imaginary or as demons in disguise. “Interpretive language” turns a fact into an interpretation of what that fact means. (Interpretive language presents an opinion as a fact.) All Gods except for Yahweh are false Gods is an opinion presented as a fact. “Repetition” of one point of view convinces people that is the only truth. Since it has been repeated for so long, that there is only One God, people have no concept of Polytheism.
 
In his book examining the Gods of the Old Testament, “The Scars of Eden,” Paul Wallis (Note 3) describes how he thinks the central proponent of Monotheism came to be. Wallis tells how the Babylonian Captivity scarred the formerly Polytheistic Hebrews. “Many scholars believe that this edit was done during Israel’s painful subjection to Babylonia…Perhaps as a consequence of that unhappy context, there is in the retelling of the old, old stories a palpable undercurrent of rage.” He reflects that this rage is reflected in “Our God is real. Yours is a fake. (Emphasis his) We will be eternally vindicated. You will be eternally shamed.” Wallis explains that this “Us and Them” “narrative undergirds the whole editorial frame work for the Bible as we have it. And it shows.”
 
What Wallis refers to “card stacking.” The original propagandist selected his information to present a one-sided view. Since no one else knew what he was referring to, they could not challenge the propagandist. He had set up a situation that no one could refute.
 
Also, Wallis points to what is known as a “manufactured problem.” First, the propagandist created the dilemma of Yahweh destroying all Polytheists. Then he convinced the other Hebrews of the seriousness of the problem. Finally, he offered his solution: “Either believe only in Yahweh, or suffer the consequences.”
 
A “single all-powerful god in heaven implied the appropriateness of a single all-powerful king on earth” according to Jonathan Kirch. He notes in “God Against the Gods,” the history of Monotheism is tied with autocracy. Egypt, Israel, and Rome all adopted a form of Monotheism and ordered the population to believe only in that particular God. To ensure their power, these God-Emperors enforced Monotheism.
 
For example, King Josiah of Judah (648 to 610 BCE) enforced the singular worship of Yahweh and centered that worship to be only in Jerusalem. His high priest had discovered a “missing” Fifth Book of Moses, which was the Book of Deuteronomy. Known as “a pious fraud,” this book enforced the point of view of radical followers of Yahweh. This allowed Josiah to conduct a bloody purge of the Polytheistic Hebrews.
 
Since Monotheism has been enforced for centuries, Polytheism is little understood. It is often regarded as “proto-monotheism” or a stepping stone to Monotheism. By understanding the logic of Monotheism, Modern Polytheists can begin to purge their thinking of Monotheistic propaganda.
 
Notes:
 
Note 1. Although there are multiple Gods of Monotheism – Yahweh, Allah, God in Three Persons – I refer to Yahweh for all of Them. The Monotheistic Gods are male, with no Consort. (In Jewish tradition, Yahweh did have Shekinah, Goddess of Wisdom, as a Consort.)
 
Note 2. In Game Theory, “Common Knowledge” is the idea that something is not merely known by all the payers in a game, but is also known to be known, and that known is also to be known, and so forth in a chain of logic.
 
Note 3. Paul Wallis, former Archdeacon of the Anglican Church, believes that the “True God is the harmonious source of all things.” Christ came to earth with a “vision of love and justice.” Otherwise, he thinks that the God (Elohim) of the Old Testament is actually plural. Moreover, these Gods (Elohim) are aliens from outer space (that is UFO Gods).
 
Further Reading:
Edward Butler, “The Way of the Gods.”
John Michael Greer, “A World Full of Gods.”
Glenn Holland, “Gods in the Desert.”
Johnathan Kirch, “God Against the Gods.”
Lynn Prickett and Clive Prince, “When God Had a Wife.”

Profile

neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
neptunesdolphins

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
4 567 8910
11 121314 151617
18 192021 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 11:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios